> On May 9, 2016, at 4:07 PM, Matthew Johnson <matt...@anandabits.com> wrote:
>
> I’m also interested in your feedback on whether a proposal around indirect is
> something worth pursuing right now or whether that is something that should
> wait until after Swift 3.
I’m not prepared to champion this for Swift 3, I think there are enough other
important proposals on the table, and this is an area that requires careful
design. If I did have to pick features that we touched on in this thread from
most to least important I would say:
1. Indirect structs
2. Mutability of reference/class types
3. Automation or annotations for CoW types.
4. Annotations that constrain function side effects.
-Andy
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
