> On May 10, 2016, at 00:53, Andrew Trick via swift-evolution
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>
>
>> On May 9, 2016, at 4:07 PM, Matthew Johnson <matt...@anandabits.com> wrote:
>>
>> I’m also interested in your feedback on whether a proposal around indirect
>> is something worth pursuing right now or whether that is something that
>> should wait until after Swift 3.
>
> I’m not prepared to champion this for Swift 3, I think there are enough other
> important proposals on the table, and this is an area that requires careful
> design. If I did have to pick features that we touched on in this thread from
> most to least important I would say:
> 1. Indirect structs
> 2. Mutability of reference/class types
> 3. Automation or annotations for CoW types.
> 4. Annotations that constrain function side effects.
>
> -Andy
Yes, but with possible exception of #2, none of those sound like
source-breaking changes. I'd imagine that changing what types of properties
value-types can have will break a few things (although I certainly could be
wrong).
- Dave Sweeris
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
