> UPDATED APPROACH
> 
> Our updated approach focuses on the two most important conventions: one for 
> initialization and one for representation.
> 
> 1. `Initializable`
> 
> `Initializable` designates protocols that convert *from* a type or from an 
> associated type mentioned in the protocol name, such as the current 
> `<Type>LiteralConvertible` protocols.  This convention would include member 
> requirements for initializers, factory methods, and any other way an instance 
> can be imported to establish a new instance of the conforming type.
> 
> For example, conforming to `ArrayLiteralInitializable` would allow a set to 
> be created with `Set(arrayLiteral: <some array>)` and `var set: Set<T> = []`.
> 
> This phrase replaces the `Creatable` form from our original proposal.
> 
> 2. `Representable`
> 
> `Representable` designates protocols whose primary purpose is to project *to* 
> a type or associated type mentioned in the protocol name.  Items in the 
> standard library that would be subsumed into this naming include 
> `CustomStringConvertible`, `CustomDebugStringConvertible`, and 
> `RawRepresentable`, which we imagine would become 
> `CustomStringRepresentable`, `CustomDebugStringRepresentable`, and (as 
> current) `RawRepresentable`.
> 
> This second category groups together the `Convertible` and `Representable` 
> categories from our original proposal and is predicated on the feedback from 
> the design team review. The `Representable` designation does not promise 
> bidirectional conversion although some `Representable` protocols may include 
> requirements to allow attempted initialization *from* the type of the 
> representation. Doing so falls outside the naming contract we are proposing. 

If we're doing this, I wonder if category 1 shouldn't just be `Convertible`. 
This would preserve our `LiteralConvertible` protocols with the same names 
(which, consistency issues aside, seem perfectly cromulent), while shifting the 
`StringConvertible` protocols over to the `Representable` category.

-- 
Brent Royal-Gordon
Architechies

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to