> On 28 Feb 2017, at 22:52, Christopher Kornher via swift-evolution 
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
> 
> What is your evaluation of the proposal?
> It seems to be a very straightforward and natural extension of existing 
> syntax to bring Swift closer to the functionality of Objective-C and other 
> languages. 
> 
> My only concern is that using `AnyObject` at first glance seems less 
> descriptive  than ‘class’ when used in a protocol declaration, but it may be 
> simply because I already familiar with the `class` syntax.

To be honest, I didn’t feel very strongly either way. But using class would 
make the following syntax valid and weird:

let a: class = Object()

So I followed the road of Objective-C, which uses the type generic class type 
(AnyObject) as the class constraint keyword.

> Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to 
> Swift?
> Absolutely. 
> 
> Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
> Yes. It is a sensible extension to existing patters. Eliminating the 
> redundancy and ambiguity in `class` and `AnyObject` eliminates a barrier to 
> understanding the language and is probably worth the pain of deprecating 
> `class` which I have used extensively in my code.
> 
> If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do 
> you feel that this proposal compares to those?
> I have used the feature numerous times in Objective-C over the years and this 
> proposal is a perfect analog as far as I know.
> 
> How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or 
> an in-depth study?
> I gave the proposal a thorough reading. It is straightforward enough to not 
> require much study.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Feb 28, 2017, at 2:11 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution 
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Swift community,
>> 
>> The review of SE-0156 "Class and Subtype existentials" begins now and runs 
>> through March 7, 2017. The proposal is available here:
>> 
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0156-subclass-existentials.md
>>  
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0156-subclass-existentials.md>
>> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews 
>> should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at
>> 
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the review 
>> manager. When replying, please try to keep the proposal link at the top of 
>> the message:
>> 
>> Proposal link:
>> 
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0156-subclass-existentials.md
>>  
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0156-subclass-existentials.md>
>> Reply text
>> 
>> Other replies
>>  
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/pull/607/files#what-goes-into-a-review-1>What
>>  goes into a review?
>> 
>> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review 
>> through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of 
>> Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to 
>> answer in your review:
>> 
>> What is your evaluation of the proposal?
>> Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to 
>> Swift?
>> Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
>> If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do 
>> you feel that this proposal compares to those?
>> How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or 
>> an in-depth study?
>> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
>> 
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md 
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md>
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> -Doug
>> 
>> Review Manager
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to