> On 1 Mar 2017, at 21:20, Matthew Johnson <matt...@anandabits.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Mar 1, 2017, at 2:16 PM, David Hart <da...@hartbit.com 
>> <mailto:da...@hartbit.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 1 Mar 2017, at 21:01, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution 
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 1, 2017, at 1:59 PM, Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution 
>>>> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> A good and necessary enhancement. My only objection is to the ordering 
>>>> rules—I'm not convinced that they pull their weight, especially given that 
>>>> typealiases can be used to introduce class constraints that aren't in the 
>>>> leftmost position. It's a lot of rules and strictures for a dubious 
>>>> benefit. 
>>> 
>>> I made a similar comment in the discussion thread.  I don’t feel strongly 
>>> enough to argue over it, but it does feel like a rather arbitrary 
>>> limitation.
>> 
>> Same reasoning for class being the first in the inheritance/conformance 
>> list: it allows you to quickly read a list and see if there is a class where 
>> you expect it. The fact that one may come from a typealias is a different 
>> story: it's the difference between being able to quickly read an expression 
>> and understanding the whole function it's contained in.
> 
> Yep, I understand this.  The difference is that in the inheritance list if 
> there is a class present it must always be explicitly declared.  This means 
> you can always tell whether a class is involved by looking at the first item 
> in the list.  That is not the case when existential are composed.  If you 
> can’t rely on this in all cases the limitation feels somewhat arbitrary.
> 
> That said, it’s not a big deal.  I appreciate the proposal very much! :)

Yeah, it’s a detail :) Just trying to describe my thought process.

>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Brent Royal-Gordon
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>> On Feb 28, 2017, at 1:11 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgre...@apple.com 
>>>> <mailto:dgre...@apple.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello Swift community,
>>>>> 
>>>>> The review of SE-0156 "Class and Subtype existentials" begins now and 
>>>>> runs through March 7, 2017. The proposal is available here:
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0156-subclass-existentials.md
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0156-subclass-existentials.md>
>>>>> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews 
>>>>> should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
>>>>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>>>>> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the 
>>>>> review manager. When replying, please try to keep the proposal link at 
>>>>> the top of the message:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Proposal link:
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0156-subclass-existentials.md
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0156-subclass-existentials.md>
>>>>> Reply text
>>>>> 
>>>>> Other replies
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/pull/607/files#what-goes-into-a-review-1>What
>>>>>  goes into a review?
>>>>> 
>>>>> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review 
>>>>> through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction 
>>>>> of Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might 
>>>>> want to answer in your review:
>>>>> 
>>>>> What is your evaluation of the proposal?
>>>>> Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to 
>>>>> Swift?
>>>>> Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
>>>>> If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how 
>>>>> do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
>>>>> How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, 
>>>>> or an in-depth study?
>>>>> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md 
>>>>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Doug
>>>>> 
>>>>> Review Manager
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> swift-evolution-announce mailing list
>>>>> swift-evolution-annou...@swift.org 
>>>>> <mailto:swift-evolution-annou...@swift.org>
>>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution-announce 
>>>>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution-announce>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>>> swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>
>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
>>>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>> swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
>>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to