Hi Tino, > On 8 Apr 2017, at 22:03, Tino Heth via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > I wish this would only be a joke, but writing the example, I actually started > liking the concept (but I have a terrible headache right now which might > affect my mind) — so either this receives some feedback, or I might start > re-proposing this ;-)
I’m not sure that this solves anything meaningful (whether in relation to SE-0169 or more generally), does it? What advantage does this provide over just declaring the protocol conformance and those methods as a direct part of the parent type? This seems like it would just introduce more indentation, and more lines of code, for zero benefit. cheers, Tony ---------- Tony Arnold +61 411 268 532 http://thecocoabots.com/ ABN: 14831833541 _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
