>> I don't buy this argument at all without an objective explanation why the 
>> curly braces of extensions should be treated different than the curly braces 
>> of types…
> Extensions are not Partials. 
>> do you think sprinkling parts of class over the project is easier to follow?
> Extensions are not Partials. 
I can't see how statement and answer(?) are related to the original post… or 
did I miss that this topic is about partials? :)

>> it can be delayed for as long as the core team likes, without causing any 
>> trouble.
> Partials limited to the same scope can do the same
That is true… so can we agree that nothing should change now, so that something 
can be added later? ;-)

> with out having to give extension special nesting powers :)
I would say there's no doubt that extensions are withhold the common nesting 
powers of all other, similar constructs in Swift: Classes can be nested, 
Structs can be nested, Enums can be nested, functions can be nested, protocols… 
I haven't tried yet, but associated objects are something comparable ;-)
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to