I added a regression test: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8161483/webrev.01/
Could someone please review that? I also need one more +1 on the code change. TiA, Pete On 7/19/16 3:17 AM, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote: > > The fix looks good to me. > > Thanks, > Alexandr. > > On 7/19/2016 5:10 AM, Pete Brunet wrote: >> Please review the following: >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8161483 >> Patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8161483/webrev.00/ >> >> This is a followon to the patch for >> JDK-8145207 [macosx] JList, VO can't access non-visible list items >> >> In order to fixJDK-8145207the AccessibleAction interface was needed >> for JList.AccessibleJList.AccessibleJListChild but a backport of this >> fix has been requested and the released public API can not be changed >> in 8u or earlier. The workaround for JDK-8145207 is to create and >> use a private subclass of JList.AccessibleJList.AccessibleJListChild, >> JList.AccessibleJList.ActionableAccessibleJListChild. The downside >> of this fix is that it returns a subclass of the >> JList.AccessibleJList.AccessibleJListChild. If a user overrides the >> class and returns from its code it will not inherit the >> AccessibleAction behavior. For JDK 9 the >> ActionableAccessibleJListChild subclass should be removed and the >> AccessibleAction implementation moved to >> JList.AccessibleJList.AccessibleJListChild. >> >> TiA, >> Pete >
