Look at .02 instead. I had an extraneous println left in .01. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8161483/webrev.02/
On 7/19/16 11:48 AM, Pete Brunet wrote: > I added a regression test: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8161483/webrev.01/ > > Could someone please review that? > > I also need one more +1 on the code change. > > TiA, Pete > > On 7/19/16 3:17 AM, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote: >> >> The fix looks good to me. >> >> Thanks, >> Alexandr. >> >> On 7/19/2016 5:10 AM, Pete Brunet wrote: >>> Please review the following: >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8161483 >>> Patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8161483/webrev.00/ >>> >>> This is a followon to the patch for >>> JDK-8145207 [macosx] JList, VO can't access non-visible list items >>> >>> In order to fixJDK-8145207the AccessibleAction interface was needed >>> for JList.AccessibleJList.AccessibleJListChild but a backport of >>> this fix has been requested and the released public API can not be >>> changed in 8u or earlier. The workaround for JDK-8145207 is to >>> create and use a private subclass of >>> JList.AccessibleJList.AccessibleJListChild, >>> JList.AccessibleJList.ActionableAccessibleJListChild. The downside >>> of this fix is that it returns a subclass of the >>> JList.AccessibleJList.AccessibleJListChild. If a user overrides the >>> class and returns from its code it will not inherit the >>> AccessibleAction behavior. For JDK 9 the >>> ActionableAccessibleJListChild subclass should be removed and the >>> AccessibleAction implementation moved to >>> JList.AccessibleJList.AccessibleJListChild. >>> >>> TiA, >>> Pete >> >
