Norbert Bollow wrote: > Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > The interface for this should ideally be closely integrated with >> > the capabilities of intelligent mail clients. >> >> That would be perfect, but it's unrealistic. A customer is unlikely >> to want to install new software on e.g. 500 or 1000 PCs to enable an >> easy feedback. > > Therefore, the interface should be standardized, and the filter > software should add a header, which provides an URL for the > interface, to messages which pass through the filter.
Yes, something like that would be very good. Maybe we need to write an RFC for the "X-ReportSpam/Unwanted" header? -- /Per Jessen, Zürich _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
