On Wednesday 10. December 2008, Chris Gravell wrote: > Sounds perfectly reasonable. This is not censorship of ones¹ > right to be. This is an example of criminality and the onus > would be on UBS et al to negate it.
What a new way of interpreting "justice". The acused has to proove its innocence... .oO(isn't that the general appearance of censorship and totalitarian regimes?) No further comments... Michi -- George Orwell was an optimist. _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
