Guys, this conversation turns really funny sometimes. One says, "I have a complex IT and network landscape with hundreds or thousands devices and business applications, and ipv6 deployment is not justified by today's needs". The other goes, nah, forget this crap, I tried ipv6 in my kitchen, and it works perfectly.
Just a side note, nothing personal :) ----- Original Message ---- > From: Jeroen Massar <jer...@unfix.org> > To: Norbert Bollow <n...@bollow.ch> > Cc: swi...@swinog.ch; Andreas Fink <af...@list.fink.org> > Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 11:26:59 AM > Subject: Re: [swinog] IPV6 Go (lazy providers) > > Norbert Bollow wrote: > [..] > > Unless there is a good solution that allows end user organizations > > (e.g. companies of any size) to run IPv6 only on some of their network > > segments, it will mean just additional pain for little or no gain to > > run IPv6 in addition to IPv4. This is both with regard to the aspect > > of cost and also from the viewpoint of complexity management from the > > perspective of the organization's IT manager. > > Most of the "Applications" that people are is Web-based nowadays. Thus > just setup an apache2, squid or other proxy that can handle v6/v4 and > you are done. Every other application that you are thinking of are > either home-grown or commercial and in most cases don't support IPv6 > yet, or will be hard to upgrade. _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
