Barry Drake wrote: > Hi there ..... > > I've only just had chance to take a proper look at the Wiki page. It > seems good as far as it goes, but I'm very concerned about the things it > doesn't compare.
why are you concerned? Fix it please. The bulk of the table was produced by myself last night in a several hour session. In the end I saw stars and did not find the simplest features anymore. So it is quite obvious that I will not have been complete. > We can't therefore say that BibleCS handles all of the modules properly: > it doesn't!!! It concerns me that the Wiki does not reflect this at > all, and if I, as a new user pick BibleCS on the grounds that all the > criteria are supposedly met (this is what the Wiki seems to suggest), I > am going to dump the Sword Project at the first trial because it simply > does not handle NET!! The page states boldly that this page is in process of development. It is not meant for endusers. Yesterday morning it did not exist. Today it is in a state which leaves the narratives aside and tries to come to a factual feature list - clearly with massive gaps. Fix it. What is the exact limitation for fort notes - 255 characters or something obvious like this? If so, put that number down and check whether other frontends have similar limitations. What is the longest footnote we have in any module? This is not an attempt at redemption for any particular frontend, but an attempt to create some clarity about features and limitations. It will need to grow considerably still - and then the even worse work will start of crystallising out the few bits which we want to present to end users, Peter Peter _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page