I don't know what's wrong except what I noted in the previous post: that there is something wrong.

I want to clear up one thing that seems to be a general misunderstanding:

Module makers should never care or know about x-preverse.
They should make their module how they think best conforms to the OSIS specification. osis2mod will add the x-preverse div to the section it things should be associated with a verse but display before the verse marker.

.... in a perfect world anyway. That's the goal, at least, and depending on who's reverted whom's revert, it might work that way now.



On 02/29/2012 11:09 AM, David Haslam wrote:
Hi Troy,

I just tried wrapping the first "section title" for Matt.1.1 as follows:

<div type="section">
<div type="x-milestone" subType="x-preverse" sID="pv1"/>
<title>Lignez Jezuz</title>
<div type="x-milestone" subType="x-preverse" eID="pv1"/>
<verse sID="Matt.1.1" osisID="Matt.1.1"/>
Levr lignez Jezuz-Krist, Mab David, Mab Abraham.
<verse eID="Matt.1.1"/>

After rebuilding the module, the title "Lignez Jezuz" had disappeared when
viewed with *Xiphos 3.1.5* (in Windows).  In its place there seemed to be an
extra space.

It was there before, albeit displayed after the verse tag.

So what's wrong?

cf. In *BibleDesktop 1.6*, the same title is still displayed, and still
after the verse tag and a line break.

The phrase "not yet supported" seems to be a considerable understatement.


Regards,

David

--
View this message in context: 
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/preverse-divs-tp4429131p4431114.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page


_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

Reply via email to