On 26.09.2016 19:43, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > Given that there is, just as Matej points out, likely only "market" space for > one library , I think success of your fork will mean exactly this - > regression and breakage for those parts you are not interested in. You have > made this very clear.
I also disagree with your market space theory regarding Sword/Sword++. And how on earth did you reach to such conclusions about regressions and breakage!? - I never said I will not support things I include in Sword++. I only said that bindings and some other stuff will not be included for the time being. Quite the contrary. And I'll keep pulling fixes from Sword as well. > But, I guess, you are not in a mood to listen to this. o_O You think? :D Regards, J _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page