These v11ns are not in the sources because we are still researching. But since these have been double checked to printed editions, I highly doubt whatever 'errors' you see are actually errors in the v11n, but rather a bad source text. I am sorry for speculating, but I know these v11ns were checked and verified by a second individual against a printed edition and also know there is a ton of low quality texts online which claim to be things which they are not. These are simply my suspicions without having the time now to put in the research. I hope you find a way to check and confirm.
Troy On 01/06/2018 12:06 PM, Cyrille wrote: > > > Le 06/01/2018 à 18:36, Troy A. Griffitts a écrit : >> >> Dear Cyrille, >> >> I just did a brief diff between the canon_lxx.h and the >> canon_lxx-super.h I sent you in my previous email, and the >> differences don't look like anything useful. I must be mistaken >> about what this file is. Have a read of the comments in the file I >> send and those in the canon_lxx.h included in 1.8.0. They are very >> similar, but the *-super.h v11n includes this comment near the end of >> the header: >> >> "This is not intended for critical editions that separately encode >> variant traditions of Joshua, Judges, Tobit, etc. that are already >> served by the Rahlfs versification system (q.v.)." >> >> I am not sure to what the "Rahlfs versification system (q.v.)" >> refers, nor the /quod vide/ at the end of the reference. >> >> I could possibly refer to the analysis of Rahlfs in the LXX v11n >> folder I send to you earlier, specifically here, but I am not sure: >> >> http://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/versification/lxx_v11ns/canon_rahlfs.h >> > My question is why this v11n are not in the sources? And I compare the > Rahlfs.h, it's not good... still a lot of issues. I ready to perform > it. Please let me know the good way to help. > But it clear for me that for the current source I have, it's not > possible to use the current LXX v11n. >> >> But I do not see any accommodation for alternate traditions in >> there. I may need to go search old emails to dig up the discussions >> on this. >> >> Troy >> >> >> >> On 01/06/2018 09:36 AM, Cyrille wrote: >>> >>> >>> Le 06/01/2018 à 17:16, Troy A. Griffitts a écrit : >>>> Hi Cyrille, >>>> >>>> Just a few comments which I hope will clear up a few things. >>>> >>>> The sword-tools SVN repo needs to be checked out to your computer >>>> before you can run the convert.sh for CCAT. The repo contains the >>>> .jar file you asked about. You cannot just download the individual >>>> convert.sh script. >>> >>> Ok It's clear. I need to clone it with hg? The user is this from the >>> automatic email send? If it is this email I can't find it again :-\ >>>> >>>> SWORD versifications are often a superset for multiple Bibles. The >>>> SWORD engine provides a facility for frontends to easily skip empty >>>> entries. Thus, when you discover that a chapter here or a chapter >>>> there has too many verses, it is probably that way to support >>>> another Bible which has more verses for that chapter. >>>> >>>> LXX v11n has been researched extensively by Chris and others. There >>>> are many issues regarding the LXX which are not easily resolved, >>>> e.g., Rahlfs providing two textual traditions of the same book in >>>> parallel with different versifications. I h research for LXX in >>>> general can be found here: >>>> >>>> http://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/versification/lxx_v11ns/ >>> >>> OK but what to do?? Is it possible to use the Rahlfs with osis2mod? >>> Because Rahlfs is not the current one. I have the Rahlfs text. If I >>> use the current LXX v11n with my text I will have really a lot of >>> issues! >>>> >>>> Hope this helps a bit. >>>> >>>> Troy >>>> >>>> On January 6, 2018 9:01:01 AM MST, Cyrille <lafricai...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> Before to work on a new module for the LXX, I decided to verify the >>>> current LXX v11n. And what was my surprise discovering many errors! >>>> Please can you give me the list of the current modules using LXX v11n? >>>> I will propose a new with correction, some books give me worries, like >>>> Esther, which contains a versification in letter, I will make you a >>>> proposal once my verification is finished. I work with the A. Rahlfs >>>> (maybe the current LXX v11n was made with an other ?) >>>> >>>> Best regards, Br Cyrille >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >>>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >>>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page