I rememeber trying this and I did not see a noticeable improvement, I am not sure if I did something wrong. Instead, we used memcached and we did see a big difference.
Pablo On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Eno <symb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Sumedh wrote: > >> Yeah, I feel we are still some distance away from needing a >> cluster...but we thought it's better to prepare in advance... > > Here's another idea (which we're using on production servers): if you > have enough physical RAM you can create a ramdisk and mount it on your > cache folder, so all cached files are now in RAM :-) In our case, we have > servers with 8Gb or more of RAM, so allocating a couple Gb for the cache > folder is no big deal. > > > -- > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony users" group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
