What's the going rate for support from Sensio for an app developed
against symfony?


On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 19:15 +0200, Alexandru-Emil Lupu wrote:
> However, symfony is open source ... :) as fabien said ... no one has
> thought to help financial sensio labs or symfony project ... 
> if is so powerfull and your managers are satisfied about the product,
> you could try convince them to donate a small amount of money to
> symfony project ... 
> Unfortunatelly, my manager is not a tech person and also does not
> understand the donation concept... he's an accountant 
> Alecs
> 
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Derrek <dle...@allofzero.com> wrote:
>         
>         
>         I would love to see a TCO study as well.
>         
>         It's just hard to compare. One of my clients that has been
>         resisting
>         symfony/php for a while just opted to have me build a
>         standalone
>         module in it. The module is a reporting tool that seamlessly
>         integrates with their database. The module took a month to
>         build and
>         exposes all of the databases tables (over 200 tables) for
>         statistical
>         processing. I couldn't have built it without symfony +
>         doctrine. It
>         could have taken months or even years on a non-mvc-orm
>         platform. I
>         didn't have to write any form code (because of
>         widgets/validators),
>         sql (because of doctrine) or handle anything but building my
>         own
>         report logic. *and* it works on SQL server and MySQL which is
>         huge
>         since this client is migrating from SQL to MySQL at the same
>         time as
>         releasing this tool.
>         
>         It's so powerful that the client is thinking about selling it
>         as an
>         add-on component as their user base would not need crystal
>         reports or
>         other reporting tools anymore.
>         
>         If you factor in situations like that, symfony would pay for
>         itself
>         dozens or hundreds of times over.
>         
>         --Derrek 
>         
>         
>         On Nov 2, 10:25 am, Lee Bolding <l...@leesbian.net> wrote:
>         > OK, now that you've mentioned porting an existing
>         application, I can  
>         > *kind of* understand that.
>         >
>         > I'd expect most management to take the approach "if it ain't
>         broke,  
>         > don't fix it" - and in their eyes it ain't broke.
>         >
>         > A while back I was in a similar situation - like you, I
>         tried to  
>         > explain the case of doing it the correct way (cheaper,
>         faster, easier  
>         > to maintain, following conventions(!) less risk, etc) but
>         they weren't  
>         > interested.
>         >
>         > If I had the time, I'd do a TCO study for my next symfony
>         project -  
>         > showing how long certain aspects took with symfony, how long
>         they'd  
>         > have taken without symfony, and how that affected the
>         overall cost/
>         > profitability of the project.
>         >
>         > It would also be good to see a similar thing to compare
>         different  
>         > frameworks - after all, apart from availability of
>         developers with  
>         > experience, the next most important thing about a framework
>         (for  
>         > management) is how much it's going to cost or save them,
>         isn't it?
>         >
>         > On 1 Nov 2009, at 21:44,Derrekwrote:
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > >> Do you know the reason they don't want to use symfony? is
>         it because
>         > >> they want to maintain the application themselves? or with
>         labour
>         > >> cheaper than yourself once it's built? it would be
>         interesting to
>         > >> know... as it could spur on a symfony and TCO study or
>         something.
>         >
>         > > It's a bunch of things. Using symfony would actually let
>         them get less
>         > > costly help than me once the app is written. The problem I
>         think is
>         > > the up-front investment in conversion. Most of them have
>         tech guys
>         > > that are comfortable with how things are now. So the tech
>         guys tell
>         > > management "we don't think it's worth the cost". It's much
>         much *much*
>         > > (let me reiterate *MUCH*) easier to get management to
>         start with
>         > > symfony on a new project. But if there is an existing
>         system, even in
>         > > php, they shy away from it. It may be a good idea to have
>         tutorials
>         > > for showing how efficiently an app can be re-developed in
>         symfony when
>         > > coming from another platform.
>         >
>         > >> I actually find that it takes me considerably longer to
>         do anything
>         > >> when not using symfony now... validators? security? ORM?
>         ergh. Even
>         > >> simple CRUD applications can be knocked out quickly -
>         remember the
>         > >> original Blog screencast for 1.0? how long did that take?
>         8 minutes  
>         > >> or
>         > >> so?
>         >
>         > > I concur, especially on new development. I can knockout a
>         new project
>         > > for a demo in a few days. Polish a large project in a few
>         weeks. But
>         > > migrating an existing system with 200+ tables in a best
>         case scenario
>         > > takes time. Time that will be saved when faced with the
>         idea of re-
>         > > creating what symfony does very well already. One of my
>         clients just
>         > > spent days re-creating doctrine's nested set capabilities.
>         They kept
>         > > looking for ways to make it "better" for their needs. In
>         the end they
>         > > spent dozens of man-hours creating something that is
>         entirely inferior
>         > > to doctrine's nested set. It would have taken me 2-3 hours
>         if they
>         > > were already in symfony.
>         >
>         > >> The only argument I can see against using symfony is for
>         the  
>         > >> reasons I
>         > >> mentioned above.
>         >
>         > > I'm not sure there are any rational arguments to not use
>         symfony (or
>         > > any other competent MVC framework like Zend). Except that
>         I get paid
>         > > way more in the long term on a project if I *don't* get
>         them on
>         > > symfony because I have to re-create so much of what it
>         does. :) Again,
>         > > I don't mind this. Clients that choose symfony accelerate
>         their
>         > > product development and meet the users needs better. The
>         problem is
>         > > proving that to management.
>         >
>         > > Anyway, back to work.
>         >
>         > > --Derrek
>         
>         
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> As programmers create bigger & better idiot proof programs, so the
> universe creates bigger & better idiots!
> I am on web:  http://www.alecslupu.ro/
> I am on twitter: http://twitter.com/alecslupu
> I am on linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alecslupu
> Tel: (+4)0748.543.798
> 
> 
> > 



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"symfony users" group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to