On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Fabian Pedregosa<fab...@fseoane.net> wrote:
>
> Vinzent Steinberg wrote:
>> 2009/7/29 Fabian Pedregosa <fab...@fseoane.net>:
>>> I don't think that will be the case, because Symbol('x', positive=True)
>>> gives the impression that assumptions are binded with symbols, but this
>>> is not the case anymore.
>>
>> It would be a handy shortcut though.
>
> Maybe. Let's just implement them as I had in mind and later if someone
> (you?) feels the need of this, just implement it. It should be easyYes, please do so. Let's merge now. If you could get things running (=done:) till this Friday, it'd be awesome. Luke and Aaron will come, so we can hack on this together. Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patches" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy-patches@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
