2009/8/4 Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz>: > Yes, please do so. Let's merge now. If you could get things running > (=done:) till this Friday, it'd be awesome. Luke and Aaron will come, > so we can hack on this together.
Yeah, let's get it merged. In the long run I would like such syntax: Assume(x > 0) Assume(x in RR) == Assume(x, rational=True) Do you think the "in" syntax could replace the keyword argument syntax? The latter one does not make much sense for relational assumptions, e.g.: Assume(x > y, positive=True) But we can implement this before the interface gets stable (i.e. before a release). Vinzent --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patches" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy-patches@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
