Hi Sebastian, On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Sebastian Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Ondrej, > below is the full traceback. > I think I'm now guesing the problem: My wx - PyShell is part of bigger > image analysis package that I'm developping; and I recently switched > over to start the python interpreter using "python -Qnew" - i.e. it > defaults to "true division" , so that 1/2 == .5 > In other words I might have to go through the sympy source and insert > a bunch "/" -> "//" replacements. > > Indeed, I just ran it using "old" default division, and the wx version > runs just like the non wx. > Maybe you guys would be interested in proofing your code for > true-division (Python 3000). It sure would make sense for a math > package like sympy ;-)
Oh, absolutely. :) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=761 We have some tests for that, but apparently they are not enough. I just did: $ python -Qnew /usr/bin/py.test sympy/core/ and a lot of bugs occured. So definitely a place for a cleanup. So that's it imho. So it's more of a luck, that things work in isympy, because isympy uses true division by default... > > Thanks for the quick reply -- I will go and get the new pyglet 1.1. I > suppose I can do a drop-in replacement into > C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\sympy\thirdparty\pyglet\pyglet Yep. Please let us know if it works and if things got better. > Thanks again for the quick reply and of course for sympy. > - Sebastian Haase > > > > > >>> Plot(x*y**3-y*x**3) > > [0]: x*y**3 - y*x**3, 'mode=cartesian' > > >>> Exception in thread Thread-2: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "C:\Python25\lib\threading.py", line 460, in __bootstrap > self.run() > File "C:\Python25\lib\threading.py", line 440, in run > self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs) > File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\sympy\plotting\plot_mode_base.py", > line 259, in _calculate_all > self._calculate_verts() > File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\sympy\plotting\plot_mode_base.py", > line 265, in _calculate_verts > try: self._on_calculate_verts() > File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\sympy\plotting\plot_surface.py", > line 13, in _on_calculate_verts > self.u_set = list(self.u_interval.frange()) > File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\sympy\plotting\plot_interval.py", > line 163, in frange > for i in self.vrange(): > File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\sympy\plotting\plot_interval.py", > line 146, in vrange > a = self.v_min + (d * Integer(i)) > File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\sympy\core\numbers.py", line > 702, in __rmul__ > return Rational.__mul__(a, b) > File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\sympy\core\sympify.py", line > 273, in __sympifyit_wrapper > return func(a, b) > File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\sympy\core\numbers.py", line > 493, in __mul__ > return Rational(self.p * other.p, self.q * other.q) > File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\sympy\core\cache.py", line 264, in > wrapper > new_args = tuple([template.process(a,func,i) for (a, template, i) > in zip(args, self.arg_templates, range(len(args)))]) > File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\sympy\core\cache.py", line 186, in > process > raise ValueError('%s %s-th argument must be of type %r but got %r' > % (func_src, index, self.allowed_types, obj)) > > ValueError: C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\sympy\core\numbers.py:435:function > __new__ 1-th argument must be of type (<type 'int'>, <type 'long'>, > <type 'str'>) but got 0.0 I don't see from this traceback why it doesn't work, but I guess it's the true division problem. Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
