On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Vinzent Steinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, I tried to use from math import * (to avoid look ups), but I > failed somehow. > > Anyway, here the result of Sage's timeit for evaluating f(1.0r) > (finally I got the point of the r :): > > compiled: 625 loops, best of 3: 2.12 µs per loop > lambda: 625 loops, best of 3: 15.8 µs per loop > fast_float: 625 loops, best of 3: 4.54 µs per loop (roughly matches > with yours) > > fast_float seems to be 3.5 times faster than pure Python, this matches > with my other benchmark (which is affected by Python's loop overhead). > > Thank you for your support.
I thank you for your benchmarks and work. So your code is actually 2x faster, than Sage's fast_float? Cool, let's put it in then. :) Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
