On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Fredrik
Johansson<fredrik.johans...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Ondrej Certik<ond...@certik.cz> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just wanted to make a quick survey how many sympy users still use 
>> python2.4?
>>
>> Now even the stable version of Debian uses python2.5. Is there still a
>> major linux distribution that uses python2.4?
>>
>> The real problem with python2.4 is that it doesn't support relative
>> imports and as such it's a realy pain to include libraries like
>> mpmath.
>
> The biggest problem with the imports in my opinion is not package
> management, but 3.x compatibility. It would be fairly easy to support
> both 2.x and 3.x in mpmath with the same codebase (and I would
> strongly prefer to do this instead of providing two versions). The
> only serious problem is that 3.x requires explicit relative imports
> while 2.4 doesn't have them.
>
> So right now the choice is between supporting 2.4 and supporting 3.x,
> and probably supporting 2.4 is the right choice for a while longer.

Cannot the 2to3 script fix that? I think it can, but maybe I am wrong.

Ondrej

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to