On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Brian Granger <ellisonbg....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > It is great to see more discussion on the assumptions system. I do > have a practical question. I am starting to work on a general quantum > mechanics module for sympy with a few other people and we definitely
I am looking forward and I'll try to help with this too. > need something *like* assumptions. > > * Which assumptions system should I start out using? I would use the new system. Try to make sure that you use the new assumptions classes, so that if we change how it works below the hood, you don't need to change anything. The API to the new assumptions system is modeled after Mathematica, so if it works for them, it should work for us. > * Are there good docs on the new assumptions system? http://docs.sympy.org/modules/assumptions.html > * Are the new assumptions system in trunk (even if most things don't use > them)? Yes. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
