I'm glad we've all made up :)

I have posted a rough draft of my GSoC proposal at
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Frank-Kreimendahl---GSoC-2011, and
I would appreciate any feedback on the it. I tried to roll the ideas
that people offered into my schedule, and I gave myself a crash course
overview of the current algorithms that are in use. One thing that I
am particularly unsure of is the functions that I am focusing on. I
come from a purely mathematical background, where rref isn't any more
or less important than eignevectors - they're both just properties of
a matrix. So, if I should focus on different functions that are often
used with sparse matrices, please point me in the right direction.

Should I go into more detail on the particular algorithms that I plan
to use?

Frank


On Mar 30, 2:02 pm, Matthew Brett <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Vinzent Steinberg
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mar 30, 6:25 am, Andy Ray Terrel <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Matthew, I would agree that civility is important, but any civility
> >> guide that tells a person not to speak up with another  is attacking a
> >> student's proposal is as useful as toilet paper.
>
> > I have to say that I'm a bit confused by the heat present in this
> > thread. For sure you can say what you think, Andy. Actually, I
> > encourage you to do so. There are many ways to say things, and I think
> > Aaron did not mean to tell you "not to speak up", but rather to state
> > your thoughts in a less emotionally heated way.
>
> Just in case it's useful:  Andy - I interpret Aaron's request for
> civility as a very gentle guide away from subtle signs that the thread
> was getting a little heated.  Specifically you said: "Furthermore I
> find it distasteful for one
> applicant to tell another that their idea is not suitable."   Now, I
> agree that's not notably rude, and your general point is reasonable.
> However, the term 'distasteful' drifts towards an emotional treatment
> of the problem - no big deal - as long as we all agree that - as you
> say - civility is important.   The key is - as you said in the
> original email - respectful disagreement.
>
> >> This thread has become a diatribe of opinions.  Nevertheless, Frank,
> >> you should submit this proposal and continue to submit a patch for the
> >> GSOC application.
>
> > I agree. Frank, please don't be scared away by conflicts in this
> > thread.
>
> I should also say that I'm on lots of mailing lists and sympy is a
> model of substantial, interesting and collegial discussion.  Thanks
> guys,
>
> Matthew

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to