I'm undecided if it should be done in isympy. Maybe there should at
least be an option.
As for how to do it, can sympify be extended to parse any python
expression (like can we make S("for i in range(10): print i") work)?
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Aaron Meurer <asmeu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
>> prerequisites for SymPy (like Python itself if you are on Windows).
>> If there were a nice GUI that was friendly, like easy access to docs,
>> automatic sympification (so no one gets caught by 1/2 problems),
>
> Just curious about this part --- do you have some idea how to do it?
> For example, Sage uses a preparser to IPython, so if you write:
>
> sage: 1/2
> 1/2
>
> you get something like ours Integer(1)/Integer(2), i.e. in isympy:
>
>>>> 1/2
> 0.5
>>>> Integer(1)/Integer(2)
> 1/2
>
> so is your idea to have this in isympy, or on what level should this
> preparsing be done?
>
> Ondrej
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
