Would it require the ast module? That is only available on 2.6+. But
that's better than nothing. 1/2 vs. S(1)/2 is by far the number one
gotcha that I see.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Aaron Meurer <asmeu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm undecided if it should be done in isympy. Maybe there should at
>> least be an option.
>
> I think we should do it as an option, yes. And we can start using it,
> as an option and see how it goes.
>
>> As for how to do it, can sympify be extended to parse any python
>> expression (like can we make S("for i in range(10): print i") work)?
>
> Yes, I think it can, as long as AST trees are used (as they are
> already in sympify). The only problem with that is that it will not
> work on the google app engine (they don't provide the "parser" module
> there), but apart from that, it should work.
>
> Ondrej
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
