#956 works fine.... it passed both the tests. Although i could n't get the
'sympy bot' to work. Does it still work??

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Chris Smith <smi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> For those that prefer to read nicely wrapped lines, let's see if this
> looks better at maximum line length of 72.
>
> There are 8 pull requests that I could use some help clearing up. They
> are listed below in order of total changed lines (something like +7-3
> in the description below means that 7 lines were added and 3 were
> deleted). The name of the branch is in braces ({}). Most of them are
> really quick reviews.
>
>
>    https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/956
>    {2978-float-int-exponents-combine}
>         +7-3 allows x**2.0*x to give x**3.0 rather than being
>         unchanged
>    https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/950 {rtools}
>         +20-6 a docstring in rationaltools was corrected and the use
>         of a dummy symbol were robustified
>    https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/838 {inv-check}
>         +15-15 a call to rref with simplify=True is used to check for
>         invertibility of matrices
>    https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/954 {nfloat}
>         +21-11 doctests in py2.5 now pass for dpll2 under windows 32-
>         bit (not sure if there were problems elsewhere)
>    https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/955 {geom-from-Tuple}
>        +12-60 geometryentity now derives from Tuple instead of tuple
>    https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/875 {cse}
>         +113-92 cse returns the same type of expression as given
>         rather than always returning a list and tries to use make
>         expressions more canonical by extracting minus signs (this is
>         not done automatically by sympy and when it is done it can
>         often identify expressions that are ill formed (e.g. hidded
>         nans)
>    https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/931 {2957}
>         +192-122 The solver now avoids some infinite recursion;
>         solves some problems for which no solution was previously
>         obtained (due to deficiencies in unrad); and checksol doesn't
>         reject real roots solutions, e.g. 1/3 is recognized as a
>         solution of `root(x**3-3*x**2, 3)+1-x` even though straight
>         substitution yields `2/3 + 2*(-1)**(1/3)/3`. (Applying
>         real_root to the substituted result yields the 0.)
>    https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/690 {xsub}
>         +400-337 subs is cleaned up and common code is factored out
>         of routines so that _eval_subs routines can just handle the
>         special replacement needs of the object. Many _eval_subs
>         routines are no longer needed.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to