Are you on Windows? I just merged a branch that should hopefully make
sympy-bot work on Windows. Please do a git pull in the sympy bot
directory and try again.
If it still doesn't work, please let us know specifically what your
problem is so we can fix it.
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:50 AM, harishma dayanidhi
<dayanidhi.haris...@gmail.com> wrote:
> #956 works fine.... it passed both the tests. Although i could n't get the
> 'sympy bot' to work. Does it still work??
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Chris Smith <smi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> For those that prefer to read nicely wrapped lines, let's see if this
>> looks better at maximum line length of 72.
>>
>> There are 8 pull requests that I could use some help clearing up. They
>> are listed below in order of total changed lines (something like +7-3
>> in the description below means that 7 lines were added and 3 were
>> deleted). The name of the branch is in braces ({}). Most of them are
>> really quick reviews.
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/956
>> {2978-float-int-exponents-combine}
>> +7-3 allows x**2.0*x to give x**3.0 rather than being
>> unchanged
>> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/950 {rtools}
>> +20-6 a docstring in rationaltools was corrected and the use
>> of a dummy symbol were robustified
>> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/838 {inv-check}
>> +15-15 a call to rref with simplify=True is used to check for
>> invertibility of matrices
>> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/954 {nfloat}
>> +21-11 doctests in py2.5 now pass for dpll2 under windows 32-
>> bit (not sure if there were problems elsewhere)
>> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/955 {geom-from-Tuple}
>> +12-60 geometryentity now derives from Tuple instead of tuple
>> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/875 {cse}
>> +113-92 cse returns the same type of expression as given
>> rather than always returning a list and tries to use make
>> expressions more canonical by extracting minus signs (this is
>> not done automatically by sympy and when it is done it can
>> often identify expressions that are ill formed (e.g. hidded
>> nans)
>> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/931 {2957}
>> +192-122 The solver now avoids some infinite recursion;
>> solves some problems for which no solution was previously
>> obtained (due to deficiencies in unrad); and checksol doesn't
>> reject real roots solutions, e.g. 1/3 is recognized as a
>> solution of `root(x**3-3*x**2, 3)+1-x` even though straight
>> substitution yields `2/3 + 2*(-1)**(1/3)/3`. (Applying
>> real_root to the substituted result yields the 0.)
>> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/690 {xsub}
>> +400-337 subs is cleaned up and common code is factored out
>> of routines so that _eval_subs routines can just handle the
>> special replacement needs of the object. Many _eval_subs
>> routines are no longer needed.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "sympy" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
