Well all we need to do is release. Then the Sage guys will merge it in. If anyone wants to expedite the process, you could help with blocking issues (http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3DRelease0.7.2+&colspec=ID+Type+Status+Priority+Milestone+Reporter+Summary+Stars&cells=tiles), especially the ones with Priority-Critical.
Aaron Meurer On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Luke <hazelnu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Now that you put it that way, it makes sense to me. :) >> Thanks! >> >> Angadh > > I agree with Tim; I think the effort would be better spent making the > existing functionality interact with well tested and reliable > solvers,. To address the scipy/numpy dependency issue, I think > getting sympy.physics.mechanics into sage would solve this problem > very well. > > Luke > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
