> Now that you put it that way, it makes sense to me. :) > Thanks! > > Angadh
I agree with Tim; I think the effort would be better spent making the existing functionality interact with well tested and reliable solvers,. To address the scipy/numpy dependency issue, I think getting sympy.physics.mechanics into sage would solve this problem very well. Luke -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
