On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Gilbert Gede <gilbertg...@gmail.com> wrote: > I added a few more points to our entry on the Ideas page, and my name as a > mentor. > > We came up with a rough roadmap for PyDy (http://pydy.org/roadmap), and I > actually think there is enough work for a student's GSoC project that would > be entirely within SymPy. That being said though, at this point it would be > more beneficial (for both groups) to do some work on things outside the > SymPy codebase. There's quite a bit of work to go on bringing > physics.mechanics from where it is now to where it is accessible by "the > masses", which would increase visibility for SymPy. We should probably put > "Powered by SymPy", or something like that, on the PyDy page, and try and > show of some of SymPy's non-mechanics abilities within the PyDy examples.
I agree. I think that PyDy is the only open source implementation of Kane's equations. Are there some commercial programs? I found this one: http://motiongenesis.com/ and I think there used to be another program "autolev", but I am not able to find any page for it. It seems to me that you are in a very good position to make something really usable for "masses". An easy to use/install package, with ipython notebook etc. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
