I expect this to turn into a flamewar, so I'm going to ask everyone to only 
give one opinion (voting style). Please please please don't fight about 
this.

I just got back from PyCon, and there was a presentation there on pep 8 
formatting, and one of the main points was that pure formatting PRs mess up 
the history (git blame no longer shows who last made a non-trivial change). 
The proposed solution would be to only fix formatting in areas where you're 
also making a non-trivial change.

For example, say I make a tiny bug fix in function foo - I could also clean 
up some of the code in foo. That way the last person to touch foo is not 
someone who added a space between an operator, but someone who actually 
changed the functionality of foo.

This is not to bash people who do formatting fixes - they are highly 
valuable, it's just saying that formatting (IMO) should be done 
incrementally as we improve the codebase, not as just formatting PRs. (docs 
are an exemption from this, as formatting can be thought of as a functional 
change).

Thoughts???

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/5fe1f28a-9ac0-42db-882a-b8ed0a0f5080%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to