It wasn't ignored, I just don't see it. All I see are detailed agreements or counters to each point that has been mentioned to be negative about rebasing.
Here is my two sentence solution: Rebasing has enough substantial negative effects on contributions that we'd like to avoid encouraging it and using it in SymPy development. The few benefits that rebasing offers are not worth the cost of the loss contributions. Can you write a two sentence solution to solving the loss of contributions due to git kung fu issues? I'm happy to read it if so. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Joachim Durchholz <j...@durchholz.org> wrote: > Am 14.07.2015 um 16:05 schrieb Jason Moore: > >> I want to discuss a comprehensive solution that >> minimizes the git kung fu overhead for sympy contributors. If you have a >> suggestion for that, please make it. >> > > I did, but that got ignored. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/55A51C13.2070900%40durchholz.org. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAP7f1AjHmGcjOJE_RWeeLPGREkHR09nRS_pZdyR0Dq6v7spyRA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
