Having had a similar experience before the most frustrating aspect of this 
is the lack of actionable material in the accusation. If I am reading 
correctly, "There is a problem. We can't tell you what it is. You need to 
shut down your site." It would be nice if github would not require a change 
on a site until an arbiter of theirs can determine that the claim is 
legitimate and then tell the site owner more specifically what the problem 
is and give them time to then appeal -- before requiring them to shut down.

/c

On Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 11:03:40 AM UTC-5 da...@dbailey.co.uk wrote:

> On 20/04/2022 21:23, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> > I don't think that's how the DMCA counter claims work. HackerRank have
> > said that they will give SymPy $25k though and it looks as if they
> > will follow through on that.
>
> That seems to show some good will on their part, and should make them a 
> bit more cautious next time. I wonder if GitHub will make a similar 
> gesture?
>
> David
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/61a026a8-7430-404d-9dcb-c8e448abbac8n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to