On Aug 9, 2013, at 7:13 AM, Lloyd Hilaiel <[email protected]> wrote:
> I propose a new sub-team named "client implementation". What does that > actually mean? > > I think this actually means a team that lands code on the elm branch, and > incrementally uplifts into nightly as it goes. I think this team targets > implementing new authentication on existing sync, no storage innovation and > minimal surgical patches into the existing sync implementation. > Sounds like a good plan. Is the goal to target sync 1.1 (built, tested, deployed, in production) or sync 2.0 (built, tested, has new-auth, but never deployed)? Do we want to spend some (server-side) engineering effort to avoid an auth flag day with current sync? Toby _______________________________________________ Sync-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev
