----- Original Message ----- > On Aug 9, 2013, at 7:13 AM, Lloyd Hilaiel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I propose a new sub-team named "client implementation". What does that > > actually mean? > > > > I think this actually means a team that lands code on the elm branch, and > > incrementally uplifts into nightly as it goes. I think this team targets > > implementing new authentication on existing sync, no storage innovation > > and minimal surgical patches into the existing sync implementation. > > > Sounds like a good plan. Is the goal to target sync 1.1 (built, tested, > deployed, in production) or sync 2.0 (built, tested, has new-auth, but never > deployed)? We need to kill discussion of using Sync1.1 as it's a dead end. Using Sync 2.0 is on the table, but we need to see more pros/cons
_______________________________________________ Sync-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev
