On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> wrote: > On Mo, 2011-12-19 at 16:47 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> >> wrote: >> > So perhaps the parameter for that can be removed and made a static >> > choice in the dbus_get_bus_connection() implementations? >> > >> >> I'm about half way through test-dbus.py and things are looking fine >> using the singleton connection acquired by g_bus_get_sync(). so, if my >> interpretation of what you're saying is correct, we can just remove >> the unshared (btw, using a negative for a boolean value is confusing.) >> option and make the gio gdbus always be a shared, singleton connection >> and the libdbus connection always be private. Correct? > > Right. > >> > So let me be more precise: a "syncevolution --version" invocation >> > segfaults. >> > >> >> Hmm. I get SyncEvolution 1.2.1+20111218+SE+3f4f71a (pre-release) when >> running that on my Debian Testing install. But we have had different >> results in the past on Deban Testing so I'm becoming less and less >> surprised by this. > > Well, Testing is a moving target ;-) We might also be compiling > differently, or there is a 32/64 bit difference (I'm using 64 bit). > > Anyway, as I am to reproduce it, finding the root cause wasn't that > difficult: > > commit b7b17159d9e89c0452e3df99a35668a468e347d7 > Author: Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> > Date: Mon Dec 19 17:57:20 2011 +0100 > > GIO GDBus: fixed memory corruption > > g_variant_get() does not work for C++ bool directly because at least > on x86_64, C++ bool uses 1 byte while gboolean uses 4. This caused > random stack corruption when unpacking four bytes into an address > which only had room for one. Caused "syncevolution --version" to segfault > when using a corrupted std::string later. > > diff --git a/src/gdbusxx/gdbus-cxx-bridge.h b/src/gdbusxx/gdbus-cxx-bridge.h > index 106b216..568642b 100644 > --- a/src/gdbusxx/gdbus-cxx-bridge.h > +++ b/src/gdbusxx/gdbus-cxx-bridge.h > @@ -1170,12 +1170,37 @@ template<> struct dbus_traits<uint32_t> : > static std::string getReply() { return ""; } > }; > > -template<> struct dbus_traits<bool> :
Should this not be the following? template<> struct dbus_traits<bool> : public dbus_traits_base Cheers, Chris _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list SyncEvolution@syncevolution.org http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution