On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 02:09 +1200, Jane Atkinson wrote: > On 09/07/12 01:32, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 16:24 +1200, Jane Atkinson wrote: > >> Can you quote the output? What kind of changes did you expect to > > get synced? > > It's a day or two now since I did this, so it's from memory. I had > changed the end time of an event - something I've done regularly in > the past with no problems. The messages in the terminal were exactly > what I'd expect to see if no changes had been made. > > Only a calendar.before directory was created - nothing else. And a log > file, of course.
Then the sync process crashed without completing normally. Otherwise there would be a calendar.after directory. Can you send me that syncevolution-log.html file? Can you reproduce the problem? If yes, then try to capture a stack backtrace of the crash, like this: - killall syncevo-dbus-server - SYNCEVOLUTION_SYNC_DELAY=60 /usr/libexec/syncevo-dbus-server & - in another shell, run the command line - in a third shell, run "gdb -p `pidof syncevo-dbus-helper`" followed by "cont" (when debugger has attached) and "thread apply all bt" (once/if it crashed) -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list SyncEvolution@syncevolution.org http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
