I’m very much in favor of aggregating and analyzing data, that’s
bascially what we do at dnswl.org <http://dnswl.org> :) Having said
that, I usually don’t see that much load on our sa-update mirror, just
a bit of bandwidth being used.
Well nice sleuthing to figure out the culprits company. I am
considering the issue closed with MS and they will never let us know the
outcome due to privacy
How can we aggregate the logs? We have a free Apache G Suite instance
I'll mention if that sparks some ideas. But perhaps even if I just
agreed to send my logs to you, it would be cool to see some stats on it.
To compare, here's the same commands on a few weeks of logs on my
server. Really surprising to see those old versions:
26592 3.3.2"
12120 3.3.1"
4531 3.1.8"
3073 3.4.1"
1506 3.2.5"
561 3.4.0"
470 3.2.1"
464 3.2.4"
107 3.2.3"
104 3.1.7"
53 3.3.0"
19 3.2.0"
18 3.2.2"
2 3.1.9"
Dave, with rules how many versions do we publish now? Just one with a
cname for a few versions? Which versions? Sorry, I can't figure out
how to get into PowerDNS to check!
BTW, Matthias, can you subscribe to this list as a mirror operator,
please? Just email sysadmins-subscr...@spamassassin.apache.org, please?
Regards,
KAM
