On Fri, 17.10.14 13:30, David Timothy Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Lennart Poettering > <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > > Does this make sense? > > Speaking as a nano user and someone who barely knows how to quit vim, > I still think the decision of the default editor should be "vi" or the > distribution's choice. Well, what's the distribution's choice? I mean, if distributions want to change things they can patch this in, they have that option anyway... Note that with the order i proposed, systems that have no "nano" installed will effectively only get vi/vim invoked here. I think nano is mostly installed only on systems where it also is the default, or where the user wants to use it, hence it's probably a good default, since there's reason enough to believe that if it is available it shall be used, and if it shall not be used it's probably not installed... In a way this mimics Debian's behaviour I figure, which also defaults to "nano" in sensible-editor, currently, AFAIK... That all said, this topic kinda enters bikeshed territory, so I figure we should just implement some alg, and stick with it. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel