On Mon, 13.10.14 15:13, Simon McVittie (simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk) wrote:
> On 13/10/14 14:38, Dale R. Worley wrote: > > My general understanding is that the traditional behavior when "you > > need an editor but the user hasn't specified one" is to use "vi", and > > so people who don't want "vi" *always* set $VISUAL in their > > environment. > > The Right Thing™ is distro-specific. Debian and its derivatives have > sensible-editor(1) which is a shell script that uses $VISUAL, $EDITOR, > nano[1] or vi; I would expect systemd in Debian to use sensible-editor > as its fallback, either via a configure option or a patch. > > In distros without sensible-editor, I'm tempted to say the solution is > "stop being a distro without sensible-editor". New systemd API? :-) I am really not sure we should expose such an API from systemd. However, I do agree that the algorithm sensible-editor exposes is reasonable enough so that we should mimic it to a certain degree, and use as built-in logic. And I figure Ronny's code is already pretty close to that. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel