2014-10-13 13:40 GMT+02:00 David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com>: > Hi Hi,
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Daniel Buch <boogiewasth...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Nice, I was in the process of implementing this. Looks good to me. But I >> think it would be better to use "vi" instead of "vim" if no &editor is set. >> Vim is not installed on every system as default but vi is most likely. > > I'd prefer doing nothing. "vi" has quite different behavior than > "vim", especially in Ex mode. And for people uncomfortable with 'vi' > it's even worth. And everyone should have set EDITOR anyway.. Yes, the first version that I made just shown an error saying that you should set SYSTEMD_EDITOR or EDITOR, but the RFE suggested using vim, and since no one was against it, I thought this was common to use vi/vim when EDITOR is not set. And, even as a vim user, I agree that for many people vi/vim is really not a good choice. I will resend the patch with the modification. Thanks ! > > Thanks > David _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel