Am Sonntag, 21. September 2014, 15:31:15 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Hello! > > I know this is a daring post. > > I just have one question. In the light of > > http://boycottsystemd.org/ > > http://uselessd.darknedgy.net/ > > developing some systemd compatible services for BSD: > http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20140915064856 > > > in the light of > > Debian Bug report logs - #727708 > tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian. > https://bugs.debian.org/727708 > > > Debian Bug report logs - #746715 > the foreseeable outcome of the TC vote on init systems > https://bugs.debian.org/bug=746715 > > > in the light of the ongoing discussions on linux-kernel, debian-devel, > debian- user and other mailing lists more than some dozens threads > meanwhile:
In my long years of using Debian and also doing some packages for it in the last years I never saw that any introduced changed caused a serious "we may need to fork" like announcement like this: http://debianfork.org/ Also the upcoming GR decision about whether to require that packages may not depend on PID 1 it refers to. I think I never saw that kind of uproar in Debian. In my view its worrying and damaging. And I think it points at a real problem. There is a dire problem with the acceptance of systemd in Debian (and not only there). In Debian this is not only with users, but also with developers. Wherever I look systemd triggers a split into "pro" and "contra". Even here at work. I still use it, I test it, it seems to work. But I am concerned. Some co-workers dislike it highly. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
