Am 26.05.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 16:39, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:which shows that a important project like systemd playing on the same level as the linux kernel *just needs* point releases, there is a reason that the kernel has point-releases and not only for the latest and greatest version, systemd as well as the kernel are not a random webbrowserThere's a stable git tree maintained by Zbigniew, Lukas and friends, that carries backports for the stable releases. Most vendors should consider following that repo I figure. I try to help the backporting business by tagging the commits I personally consider backport-worthy with "git notes" and the "Backport:" field
it just works poor * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185278 never got fixed in F20 but is fixed in Fedora 21 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185277 open for monthsand in general a bunch of git commits don't replace a upstream changelog of a minor release where as user you never have any idea what your current installed package really is
with a 220.1 and a usptream download of 220.1 containing a changelog things are entirely different (besides that the version numbers for a project existing just a few years are strange to say it nicely)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
