Am 26.05.2015 um 18:22 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 17:57, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:Am 26.05.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Lennart Poettering:On Tue, 26.05.15 16:39, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:which shows that a important project like systemd playing on the same level as the linux kernel *just needs* point releases, there is a reason that the kernel has point-releases and not only for the latest and greatest version, systemd as well as the kernel are not a random webbrowserThere's a stable git tree maintained by Zbigniew, Lukas and friends, that carries backports for the stable releases. Most vendors should consider following that repo I figure. I try to help the backporting business by tagging the commits I personally consider backport-worthy with "git notes" and the "Backport:" fieldit just works poor * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185278 never got fixed in F20 but is fixed in Fedora 21Well, it's not really a bug. We require util-linux to be around. If you make it unavailable then you get to to keep the pieces. It's that simple
sftp-chroot worked fine until Fedora 20 and started to work again with Fedora 21 so please don't pretend anything else than systemd is (or was) responsible to fail proper shutdown and termination of the recently by systemd invented user-session processes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
