On Tue, 26.05.15 19:13, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote: > > Am 26.05.2015 um 18:22 schrieb Lennart Poettering: > >On Tue, 26.05.15 17:57, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote: > >> > >>Am 26.05.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Lennart Poettering: > >>>On Tue, 26.05.15 16:39, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote: > >>>>which shows that a important project like systemd playing on the same > >>>>level > >>>>as the linux kernel *just needs* point releases, there is a reason that > >>>>the > >>>>kernel has point-releases and not only for the latest and greatest > >>>>version, > >>>>systemd as well as the kernel are not a random webbrowser > >>> > >>>There's a stable git tree maintained by Zbigniew, Lukas and friends, > >>>that carries backports for the stable releases. Most vendors should > >>>consider following that repo I figure. > >>> > >>>I try to help the backporting business by tagging the commits I > >>>personally consider backport-worthy with "git notes" and the > >>>"Backport:" field > >> > >>it just works poor > >> > >>* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185278 > >> never got fixed in F20 but is fixed in Fedora 21 > > > >Well, it's not really a bug. We require util-linux to be around. If > >you make it unavailable then you get to to keep the pieces. It's that > >simple > > sftp-chroot worked fine until Fedora 20 and started to work again with > Fedora 21 so please don't pretend anything else than systemd is (or was) > responsible to fail proper shutdown and termination of the recently by > systemd invented user-session processes
Well, we still require /usr/bin/kill from util-linux to be around. We did not fix your "bug"... Maybe this doesn't trip up anymore, but we didn't specifically "fix" anything... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel