For a time of 10 minutes, the conversion factor would be about 3.6 to
3.7 seconds. That is, both metric times mentioned are intrinsically
superior to the 10:01.6 non-metric one.
David Dallman
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Post, Marty wrote:
> South Lakes 9:49.78 at the distance medley broke the 14-year-old HSR of
> 9:53.31 by McCullough.
>
> However,. back in 1977 South Eugene ran a 10:01.6 when the legs were at
> non-metric yard distances.
>
> What's the conversion factor and which mark is intrinsically superior?
>
>
> Marty Post
> Senior Editor
> Runner's World Magazine
> www.runnersworld.com
>
>
David Dallman
CERN - SIS
- t-and-f: what's the best HS distance medley of all-time? Post, Marty
- RE: t-and-f: what's the best HS distance medley of all-... Ben Hall
- RE: t-and-f: what's the best HS distance medley of all-... Fred Finke
- Re: t-and-f: what's the best HS distance medley of all-... WMurphy25
- Re: t-and-f: what's the best HS distance medley of ... David Dallman
- Re: t-and-f: what's the best HS distance medley of all-... David Dallman
- Re: t-and-f: what's the best HS distance medley of all-... Edward Koch
- Re: t-and-f: what's the best HS distance medley of all-... RunrCoach
