OK, 50 it is. What a win-win situation: you don't have to wax sciolistic and we only have to pay you a tenth the price!
> From: "malmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 15:00:27 -0500 > To: "'ghill'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'track list'" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: t-and-f: can I come back now? It depends...what do youthinkof > Milli Vanilli? > > I can't write. Besides I've never been much into verbiage. Pith is > grand. If you can say it in 50 words, then why waste 450 more on a > sciolistic smokescreen? > > malmo > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of ghill > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:16 AM > To: track list > Subject: Re: t-and-f: can I come back now? It depends...what do > youthinkof Milli Vanilli? > > > > >> From: "malmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:23:15 -0500 >> To: "'ghill'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'track list'" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: RE: t-and-f: can I come back now? It depends...what do you >> thinkof Milli Vanilli? >> >> One of the cornerstones of the liberal mind: issues are only issues if > >> they are YOUR issues. Perhaps you believe that it's a "discussion" >> only if you are comfortable with the subject and you call it "yelling" > >> if you are not? >> >> I believe there are more, rather than fewer, of us who'd like to see >> some backbone from the "Bible of the Sport". It's your slogan, not >> ours. >> >> malmo-Two-ms: Stentorian? NOT! >> > > OK, Caped Crusader, here's your chance to make a difference. > > Instead of wasting your words on the choir here, create some new gospel > where you apparently think it's truly needed. > > Pen a screed of some 500 words of what you think T&FN should have been > saying all these years and--so long as it doesn't run the risk of > involving us in a lawsuit--we'll print it in toto. > > Sha-zam! > > gh > >
