2010/5/5 John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com>: > On 5 May 2010 23:57, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I suggest to change leisure=park to landuse=grass if it is not a park. > > This was covered in another thread, landcover isn't the same thing as > landuse, the only landuse=grass I can think of is turf farms, > surface=grass is more appropriate...
while I understand you and generally would agree this is not OSM-reality. landuse-OSM is not landuse as you would guess by the actual meaning. As long as surface or landcover are not rendered this won't change, despite all "don't map for the renderers" appeals. >> +1, when they share node in reality > So make a relation, they share the segment, not just the nodes... this is in many case overengineered. I'm not against the use of relations but for many landuses and buildings with only 2 nodes in common a relation complicates the situation without any benefit. Even the db gets more load when using the relation I suppose. For a normal block in the city you would need 20-40 relations just because all buildings are in touch. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
